Family law guide
Part of: Non Molestation Order
Form FL401 is the court application you use to ask for protection from abuse, or for a decision about who lives in your home. One form covers both, and you can ask for either or for both together (HM Courts & Tribunals Service guidance). There is no court fee. You must send a written statement with it (Family Procedure Rules 2010, r.10.2(1)), and that statement usually decides the outcome. Our non molestation order specialists assist and advise at every stage. This page covers the law of England and Wales only.
If you are in immediate danger, call 999. If the person you need protection from can see this device, GOV.UK lists organisations that can help, and you can close this page now and read it somewhere safer.
Reviewed by: Hannah Overton, Complex Children Specialist & Client Support, Kabir Family Law
It is the single application form for Part 4 of the Family Law Act 1996. The cover page says so in as many words: “Apply for a non-molestation or occupation order — Family Law Act 1996 (Part 4)”. So the FL401 form is not one order. It is the door to two of them, and you choose at question 1.1 which door you are going through.
The current version runs to 22 pages, and every footer carries the number 02.23. Most of those pages are guidance notes down the right-hand side rather than boxes to fill in, so the form is shorter in practice than the page count suggests. GOV.UK publishes it alongside a template statement and an easy-read version.
Most people know what they want to happen. Fewer know which of the two boxes on the FL401 form delivers it. The difference matters, because one is about behaviour and the other is about a building.
You want the contact, the threats or the turning up to stop.
You want the court to say who stays, who leaves, or who can return.
Section 7 of the form deals only with the second of those, and its own note says so: “Please only complete this section if you are applying for an occupation order.” Before you ask for one, read our guide to the balance of harm test, because that is the question the court asks itself. Section 33(6) lists the factors it must weigh (Family Law Act 1996).
A third route exists in a handful of pilot areas, and it uses a different form. Our guide to domestic abuse protection orders explains that scheme, and GOV.UK lists the areas it covers.
You can apply if you are an “associated person”. That is a defined legal term, not a judgement about how serious things are. Section 4 of the form exists purely to test it, and its note explains why: “To get an injunction against the respondent, you will need to show the court that you have a connection to them.”
The statutory list is wide (s.62(3)). It reaches spouses and civil partners, past and present, and cohabitants past and present. Anyone who lives or once lived in the same household is on it too, along with relatives and people who agreed to marry. So are people who “have or have had an intimate personal relationship with each other which is or was of significant duration”. Two people who are both parents of, or who have parental responsibility for, the same child also count as associated persons.
Two limits catch people out. First, an ended engagement stops counting three years after it ended (s.42(4)). Second, a child under 16 needs the court’s permission before applying at all, and the court grants it only if satisfied the child has “sufficient understanding” (s.43). GOV.UK translates the intimate-relationship limb as a relationship of more than six months, although the statute itself uses the words “significant duration”.
Eight numbered sections, and you will not need all of them. Knowing which ones apply before you start is the difference between an afternoon and a fortnight.
Then comes the part that does the real work. Your application needs a written statement to support it (FPR r.10.2(1)), and GOV.UK publishes a template for it, which is why people search for “FL401T”. The tick boxes in section 6 summarise. The statement is where the court reads what happened, when, and what you are afraid will happen next.

The court reads whatever you write there under a statement of truth, so accuracy matters more than force. Our guide to statements in the family court explains how judges read them.
You leave it out, and you put it on a separate form C8 instead. The instruction on the first page of the application could not be blunter: “If you do not want your or your child’s contact details to be shared with the respondent, do not put these in at any point on the form, even when asked.”
The same page adds a second warning that people miss. Contact details must not appear on any other document you send either, including your evidence. If you are living in a refuge, that instruction is the important one on the whole form.
Three practical points follow from it, and all three come from the form’s own guidance notes. You can ask for your papers to go to a different address, in writing, on a separate sheet. You should not choose the telephone as your contact preference if calls are not safe, and you can give the court safe times to ring. Finally, if you think the other person can reach your email account, set up a new one and use that instead.
Yes, in the right circumstances. The court may make either order “even though the respondent has not been given such notice of the proceedings as would otherwise be required by rules of court”, where it is just and convenient to do so (Family Law Act 1996, s.45(1)). You ask for it at question 1.2, and question 1.3 then offers three reasons, straight out of the statute.
Those reasons are a risk of significant harm if the court does not act immediately, a real chance that you would give up the application without an order, and a belief that the other person knows about the case and is deliberately avoiding service. Your statement must then say why you did not give notice (FPR r.10.2(4)).
Two things are worth knowing before you ask. An order made this way “will usually last until your hearing”, in GOV.UK’s words, rather than for months. And the court must give the other person a proper chance to put their side of it at a full hearing afterwards (s.45(3)). So this route buys protection quickly. It does not end the case.
The rules fix the sequence below. Every step has caught somebody out, and the service steps catch the most people of all.
An undertaking is a promise to the court rather than an order. It has one hard limit that is easy to miss. Where violence has been used or threatened, and an order is needed so that a breach counts as a crime, the court must not accept an undertaking instead (s.46(3A)).
This is where a lot of published advice is out of date, so it is worth being exact. Two different mechanisms exist, and which one applies depends on which order the court made.
The criminal law enforces an order to stop abusive behaviour. Doing anything the order prohibits, without reasonable excuse, “is guilty of an offence”, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment on indictment (s.42A). That route began on 1 July 2007. On the same day, Parliament repealed the old power to attach a power of arrest to such an order, so the court can no longer attach one (s.47(1), repealed 1.7.2007). Section 47(2) now reads “an occupation order” and nothing else.
An order about the home works the other way round. Where the court makes one and it appears that violence has been used or threatened, the court “shall attach a power of arrest” unless satisfied you would be adequately protected without it (s.47(2)). A constable may then arrest without a warrant. Where the order carries no power of arrest, or where it is the behaviour type, you can still apply for a warrant for arrest, on oath (s.47(8) and (9)).
In plain terms: if someone breaks the behaviour order, you call the police, and it is a crime. That is a stronger position than the one it replaced, not a weaker one.
Some people reach this page holding the application rather than writing it. Being named on it is not a finding that anything happened. An application is one person’s account, supported by their statement, and the court has decided nothing yet. Somebody should hand you the application, that statement and notice of the hearing, not less than 2 days before it or within a period the court directs (FPR r.10.3(1)).
If the court has already made an order without hearing from you, that is not the end of it either. GOV.UK says such an order “will usually last until your hearing”, and the court must give you the chance to put your side of it at a full hearing (s.45(3)). Until that hearing, the order binds you exactly as it is written, whatever you think of the account behind it.
Two things follow immediately. Doing anything an order to stop behaviour prohibits, without reasonable excuse, is itself a criminal offence (s.42A), so the order has to be obeyed to the letter while it is disputed. And do not try to settle it directly with the person who applied, because contact is usually the very thing the order stops. Changing or ending an order once it exists is a separate application on form FL403. If a hearing date is already on your papers, a free initial consultation is worth having before it, not after.
Choose what you are asking the court for, then tick what is already true. The list shows you what the court will be looking for and where the gaps are. It does not fill anything in for you.
There is no score. Anything you cannot tick yet is worth raising before you send anything to the court.
Those judgement calls turn on the detail of your situation, and they are far easier to get right at the start than after a first hearing.
Book a free initial consultation
One of our specialists will give you initial advice on your situation.
Almost none of the damage comes from the tick boxes. It comes from the parts nobody reads twice.
Our specialists assist and advise from the first conversation. They explain which of the two orders fits what you actually want to change, and what the court will weigh before it makes one. A specialist also explains how a judge reads a statement, and what that judge listens for. The practical safety choices the form puts in front of you come into that conversation too, such as keeping an address confidential and asking for measures at court. If a hearing is coming, our guide to attending court after abuse and to special measures covers what the building will be like.
A free initial consultation is a conversation with a specialist, who gives you initial advice on your circumstances. It does not include drafting or reviewing documents. Before the call, it helps to have in mind the dates of the two or three incidents that worry you most, and whether any family court case is already running.
No. The official guidance states that “there are no court fees for applying”, and the fee table used by the courts records “No fee” against an application for a non-molestation order and against an application for an occupation order. That has nothing to do with your income and nothing to do with help with fees. The application is free to everyone, whichever of the two orders you ask for.
FL401T is the template supporting statement that sits alongside the application on GOV.UK. The form itself points you to it: “You will need to include a supporting witness statement with your application. You can find a template statement and guidance for how to complete it alongside this form.” You do not have to use the template, but if you write your own you must read the guidance inside it and include the statement of truth wording.
There is an online route. CourtNav, run by RCJ Citizens Advice, helps you put an application together and puts you in touch with advisers. The form says that if you use it, “you will not need to complete this FL401 form or a supporting statement – CourtNav will complete both for you”. Otherwise you download the form, complete it, and email, post or hand it in to a family court that deals with domestic abuse cases.
If you complete the form and statement electronically, you email them, and you need no copies. If you fill them in by hand, the form asks for three copies of each for an application to stop behaviour, or four copies of each for an application about the home. The last page of the form carries that instruction, so check it against the version you have downloaded rather than relying on an older figure.
Usually yes. Someone must hand the papers to them personally, not less than two days before the hearing, unless the court directs a different period. If you have asked the court to act without telling them first and the court agrees, nobody serves the application on them beforehand. They find out afterwards, and they get a full hearing at which they can answer it.
Yes, and somebody else must. The rules stop an applicant from serving an application personally. If you do not have anyone acting for you, you can ask a court official to serve the documents, at no cost, by sending form D89 with your application. A professional process server is the other option. Doing it yourself is not.
The court can make an order to stop behaviour “for a specified period or until further order”, so it sets the length in your case rather than a rule setting it in advance. An order made inside another family case ends with that case if the court dismisses it. If you still need protection as the end date approaches, you apply to extend it before it runs out, not after.
A child under 16 needs the court’s permission first, and the court can only give it if satisfied the child has sufficient understanding to make the application. A 16 or 17 year old needs an adult to help, and the form sets out which extra forms that adult completes. If a child in your household needs protecting, you can usually name them in your own application instead.
Tell the court. Question 1.5 of the form asks whether any bail conditions stop the other person contacting or coming near you, and question 1.6 asks when they end. Bail conditions are temporary and belong to a criminal case, so they can lapse at a point you do not control. The court needs to see that gap to decide what protection you need and for how long.
The application itself is free, and the paperwork is only the visible part. What decides the outcome is which order you ask for, what your statement says, and whether you made the safety choices on the form deliberately. Getting those right at the start is far easier than unpicking them after a first hearing. Book a free initial consultation, and one of our specialists will give you initial advice on your options.
Book a free initial consultation or call 0330 094 5880
You can also return to our guide to the non molestation order, or read about an occupation order.
General information about the law in England and Wales, not advice on your circumstances.
People spend hours on the tick boxes and twenty minutes on the statement, when the court spends it the other way round. The boxes tell a judge what you want. The statement tells them why it matters now, and it is the only part that can do that. So before you write a word of it, decide what you are asking for and why now, rather than after the last twelve months. A short, dated, specific account carries further than a long one.
Iblal Iqbal, Partner & Family Law Strategist
8 of 26 guides — scroll sideways for more
Short videos from the Kabir Family Law team, explaining family law in plain English.
We are a team of legally trained family law and divorce specialists with years of experience across all areas of family law. We are not part of a firm of solicitors, do not undertake legal reserved activities unless permitted and are therefore entirely independent. Please subscribe to our mailing list.
Type a topic to see the pages that cover it, or choose one below.
Or choose a topic
Or call us on 0330 094 5880
A few things we have shared lately. Plain answers, quiet updates, and the occasional reminder that you are not the first person to stand where you are standing.
Kabir Family Law, the start of the bright side of life.
View this Facebook post, opens in a new tab
When the roots are deep there is no reason to fear the wind.
View this Instagram post, opens in a new tab
Kabir Family Law brings hope to families in times of crisis.
View this X post, opens in a new tab
You are never truly alone. Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is ask…
View this Facebook post, opens in a new tab
Would you rather talk it through with someone?
Book a free consultationThe first conversation with one of our family law specialists costs nothing.
12 Cathedral Rd
Pontcanna
Cardiff
CF11 9LJ
Friars House,
Coventry
CV1 2TE
Chester House
1st and 3rd Floors
81 - 83 Fulham High Street
Fulham
London
SW63JA
16 High Holborn
Holborn
London
WC1V6BX
Clavering House
Clavering Place
Newcastle upon Tyne
Tyne and Wear
NE1 3NG
20-30a Abington Street
Northampton
NN1 2JA
2 King St
Nottingham
NG1 2AS
1 & 3 Kings Meadow
Oxford
OX2 0DP
2 Copenhagen St
Worcester
WR1 2HB
Tower Court
3 Oakdale Road
North Yorkshire
York
YO30 4XL
You do not need the right words. Tell us what is happening, or pick whatever comes closest.
What is happening?