Family law guide
Part of: Financial Settlement after Divorce
Form RX4 asks HM Land Registry to withdraw a restriction from the register, so a property can change hands. After a divorce, that entry often blocks the last step between the order you fought for and the home finally moving into one name. However, RX4 works only when the person who benefits from the restriction consents, and for the commonest entry of all it is usually the wrong form. Our financial settlement after divorce specialists assist and advise at every stage of the transfer. This page covers the law of England and Wales.
It explains what the restriction does, which HM Land Registry form takes it off, and what else has to happen before the title can move. It is not a step-by-step land registration manual, because a mistake on the register costs a great deal to unpick.
Reviewed by: Garry Steedman, Family Law Consultant (Divorce, Children & TOLATA), Kabir Family Law
Form RX4 asks HM Land Registry to withdraw a restriction from the proprietorship register of a title. It transfers nothing, and it removes nobody’s name from the deeds. It only takes away the entry that tells HM Land Registry to refuse a dealing until someone meets a condition.
The power comes from section 47 of the Land Registration Act 2002, and the detail sits in rule 98. Rule 98(2) defines the “required consent”: the person the restriction names, or, where it names nobody, everyone who appears to the registrar to have an interest in it. A conveyancer can instead certify that they hold those consents (r.98(4)). Once the registrar accepts that consent, HM Land Registry removes the entry and does not reopen the question of whether the restriction still serves a purpose.
That is the whole appeal of the RX4 route. It moves quickly and it costs nothing, because consent has already settled the argument. So the practical question is never “how do I fill this in”. It is whether you may use it at all.
People look up the land registry form RX4 expecting one answer. In fact there are three, and only one of them is RX4. Which applies depends on who benefits from the restriction and on what it actually says.
For when the person who benefits agrees to let it go.
For when the restriction has served its purpose.
For when the entry cannot come off before completion.
Rule 98(3) is the trap. It blocks withdrawal of a restriction that reflects a limit on a proprietor’s powers under statute or the general law, one the registrar had to enter, or one that mirrors a court order or an undertaking given in place of one. Practice guide 19 then spells out that Forms A, B and C “will very often” come within that rule. In other words, most jointly owned family homes carry an entry that RX3 and ST5 cancel, rather than one an RX4 form withdraws.
A restriction does not stop you selling or transferring. It stops HM Land Registry registering the deal until someone meets its condition. Until that happens, the register still shows the old owners, whatever the paperwork on your kitchen table says.
The usual entry is the standard Form A restriction, which appears whenever a couple hold as tenants in common or a beneficiary asks for one. Practice guide 19 explains its purpose plainly: it makes sure any capital money reaches two trustees or a trust corporation. That protects whoever holds a share behind the legal title. So it does exactly its job when it holds up a transfer into a single name.
Two further points catch people out. First, HM Land Registry does not cancel restrictions automatically once a disposition goes through, so an entry can sit on a title for years after it stopped mattering. Second, and more painfully, HM Land Registry states that a restriction may catch an application to register a disposition “even when the disposition is made pursuant to an order of the court”, and it names the breakdown of a marriage as the example. A sealed order is not a key to the register.
If you are still deciding who keeps the home rather than how to move it, our guides to the financial consent order and to a Mesher order cover that earlier stage. Unmarried couples follow a different route through a TOLATA property claim, and a declaration of trust often records the shares behind the title.
Every title is different. Even so, a transfer after divorce usually moves through the same six stages, and the register comes last rather than first.
Only step six is really about forms. The first five decide the settlement, and that is where a specialist earns their keep.
Pick the route that fits, then tick what is already true today. The gaps are what to raise before anybody signs anything.
There is no score. Anything you cannot tick yet is worth raising before anyone signs the transfer.
Those calls turn on the wording of your title and your order. Also, they cost far less to get right before the transfer than afterwards.
Book a free initial consultation
One of our specialists will give you initial advice on your situation.
Most of these show up at the end, when everyone assumed the hard part was over. Each one costs less to avoid than to fix.
Stamp duty is usually the easy one. A transaction between spouses made under a court order on divorce, or under an agreement made in connection with it, is exempt from stamp duty land tax (Finance Act 2003, Sch. 3, para. 3), and civil partners have the same exemption under paragraph 3A.
Our specialists assist and advise from the first conversation. They explain what your title entry means for the settlement you are negotiating, and which questions the register will ask at the end. Because timing matters, expect practical guidance on the order of events: final order, lender, deed, entry, registration. If the other side stalls, they explain the routes the court has for that too. Our guides to the pension sharing order and to enforcing financial court orders cover the neighbouring pieces.

A free initial consultation is a conversation with a specialist, who gives you initial advice on your circumstances. It does not include drafting or reviewing documents. Before the call, have the property address to hand, plus a rough value, the mortgage balance and the date you separated.
The person who benefits from the restriction has to consent. Rule 98(2) of the Land Registration Rules 2003 sets out whose consent counts: the person the restriction names, or, in any other case, everyone who appears to the registrar to have an interest in it. Rule 98(4) lets a conveyancer certify that they hold those consents, rather than lodging each one. Without the required consent, the application fails.
Usually not. HM Land Registry’s practice guide 19 says standard Forms A, B and C “will very often” fall within rule 98(3), and rule 98(3) rules out withdrawal altogether for those entries. The guide points to form RX3 to cancel, with form ST5 supplying the evidence for a Form A entry. So check which entry your title carries first, because the two routes are not interchangeable.
It goes to HM Land Registry, either through its digital service or to the standard address for postal applications, and you lodge it as a “withdrawal of a restriction” transaction. Practice guide 19 confirms that no fee is payable to withdraw a restriction, and none is payable to cancel one either. The transfer of the property itself is a separate application, and that one does carry a scale fee.
No. Removing a name from the title is a transfer, and it happens on a transfer deed that both of you sign. The RX4 form only asks HM Land Registry to withdraw a restriction entry. People often confuse the two, because the restriction is what blocks the transfer at the final hurdle, so they frequently lodge both applications together.
The court has an answer for that. Where a court has ordered someone to execute a document and they neglect or refuse to comply, or nobody can find them after reasonable inquiry, the court may nominate another person to execute it (Senior Courts Act 1981, s.39). A deed signed that way works as if the person the court originally directed had signed it.
No. Practice guide 19 states that a restriction stays in the register until it is cancelled or withdrawn, and that a disposition does not end it automatically. HM Land Registry may remove one that has clearly become superfluous, but that is a discretion, not a promise. It explains why an old entry sometimes surfaces years later, when someone tries to sell or remortgage.
Generally not. A transaction between one party to a marriage and the other is exempt from stamp duty land tax if it is made under a court order on divorce, annulment or judicial separation, or under an agreement made in connection with it (Finance Act 2003, Sch. 3, para. 3). Civil partners have an equivalent exemption in paragraph 3A. Check your own facts, because the exemption depends on how you make the transfer.
A restriction left on a title can stall a sale or a remortgage years after the divorce, and by then the person whose consent you need may be much harder to reach. Book a free initial consultation, and one of our specialists will give you initial advice on where your transfer actually stands.
Book a free initial consultation or call 0330 094 5880
You can also return to our guide to financial settlement after divorce.
General information about the law in England and Wales, not advice on your circumstances.
Before you argue about who keeps the home, download a copy of the title and read the proprietorship register. It takes minutes, and it tells you whether an entry sits there, which one it is, and whose consent you will need at the end. Families often agree terms for months, then discover at completion that the one person who has to consent has stopped answering. Knowing that on day one changes how you word the order.
Iblal Iqbal, Partner & Family Law Strategist
8 of 20 guides — scroll sideways for more
Tradwife Legal Protection UK: Essential Rights and Safeguards for Traditional Wives?
Financial Consent Order
Enforcement of Financial Court Orders
Section 25 Conduct Argument
Teacher Pension Delays in Divorce: Understanding Your Rights and Options
Will I Have to Share My Bonus in Divorce?
Short videos from the Kabir Family Law team, explaining family law in plain English.
We are a team of legally trained family law and divorce specialists with years of experience across all areas of family law. We are not part of a firm of solicitors, do not undertake legal reserved activities unless permitted and are therefore entirely independent. Please subscribe to our mailing list.
Type a topic to see the pages that cover it, or choose one below.
Or choose a topic
Or call us on 0330 094 5880
A few things we have shared lately. Plain answers, quiet updates, and the occasional reminder that you are not the first person to stand where you are standing.
Kabir Family Law, the start of the bright side of life.
View this Facebook post, opens in a new tab
When the roots are deep there is no reason to fear the wind.
View this Instagram post, opens in a new tab
Kabir Family Law brings hope to families in times of crisis.
View this X post, opens in a new tab
You are never truly alone. Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is ask…
View this Facebook post, opens in a new tab
Would you rather talk it through with someone?
Book a free consultationThe first conversation with one of our family law specialists costs nothing.
12 Cathedral Rd
Pontcanna
Cardiff
CF11 9LJ
Friars House,
Coventry
CV1 2TE
Chester House
1st and 3rd Floors
81 - 83 Fulham High Street
Fulham
London
SW63JA
16 High Holborn
Holborn
London
WC1V6BX
Clavering House
Clavering Place
Newcastle upon Tyne
Tyne and Wear
NE1 3NG
20-30a Abington Street
Northampton
NN1 2JA
2 King St
Nottingham
NG1 2AS
1 & 3 Kings Meadow
Oxford
OX2 0DP
2 Copenhagen St
Worcester
WR1 2HB
Tower Court
3 Oakdale Road
North Yorkshire
York
YO30 4XL
You do not need the right words. Tell us what is happening, or pick whatever comes closest.
What is happening?