Family law guide
Part of: How to Win a TOLATA claim on a property following separation
Occupation rent is a payment a court can order from the co-owner who lives in a shared home to the co-owner who does not. Some people call it occupational rent. The law of England and Wales treats it as compensation, not rent, and it is never automatic (TOLATA 1996, s.13(6)). If you moved out after a separation, or your former partner now asks you for money because you stayed, this page shows how a judge approaches the figures. Our TOLATA property claim specialists assist and advise at every stage. This page covers the law of England and Wales only.
Reviewed by: Garry Steedman, Family Law Consultant (Divorce, Children & TOLATA), Kabir Family Law
Think of it as a balancing payment between two owners rather than a tenancy. A tenant pays rent under an agreement with a landlord. A co-owner pays because a judge decides that fairness needs it. Courts reach for two sources here. The first is the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. It allows conditions, including compensation, when one owner loses the right to occupy, and it lets a court make orders about them. The second is equitable accounting, the older set of principles judges use to settle sums between co-owners before a sale. Both routes land in the same place, because each one adjusts what the two of you finally walk away with.
Only when something makes it fair. In 2022, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the default position is no payment, and that the focus is on how the owner who stayed has behaved. So a judge looks for conduct by that owner, or some feature of their position, that justifies a different result. For example, the owner who stayed may have stopped the other owner using a right to live there that they wanted to use, perhaps by changing the locks. Alternatively, the owner who stayed may be making money from the home. Where a marriage has broken down, the spouse who leaves is in most cases treated as excluded from the family home, although judges stress that this is not a fixed rule. By contrast, an owner who left by choice, and would have been welcome back, usually has a weaker claim.
Usually the owner who left raises it with the owner who stayed. Check whether any of these situations match yours.
The question works from both sides. If your former partner has demanded payment, you can answer with what you have paid since they moved out. Either way, the earlier you understand the account, the calmer the conversation becomes.
No fixed formula exists. However, the figure usually comes from working through these questions in order.
A worked illustration. These round numbers come from no real case. They only show how the steps fit together.
In practice those offsets can swallow much of the claim. So the honest answer for many families is a modest adjustment at the end, not a windfall along the way.
Equitable accounting is the process of settling what each co-owner has put in, or taken out, before anyone splits the sale proceeds. The Court of Appeal describes the court’s task as doing broad justice between co-owners, so three items come up again and again.
A judge reads both sides of the account together. That is why a claim for rent so often meets a claim for mortgage credit coming the other way.
A list shows you what to gather. It cannot tell you whether the owner who stayed has done enough to move a judge away from the no-payment starting point, how the mortgage will be treated in your case, or whether the sum at stake is worth a dispute. Those are judgement calls, and they depend on your whole situation. Book a free initial consultation, where one of our specialists gives you initial advice on where you stand.
Our specialists assist and advise from the first conversation. They explain where you stand, then set out what a court is likely to weigh in your circumstances. Evidence matters most, so expect practical help with rental comparables, mortgage statements and the dates that fix the period. If an offer arrives, a specialist talks it through with you, and prepares you for each stage should a court application become necessary. Nobody promises you a figure, because the judge holds that discretion. Instead, you get a realistic view of the range and the reasons sitting behind it.

A separate route exists when someone had to leave, often after domestic abuse. If a court makes an occupation order, section 40 of the Family Law Act 1996 lets it order the person who stays to make periodical payments to the other. That route protects the home in the short term, while the ownership account waits for the wider settlement.
A cohabitation agreement or a declaration of trust can head off many of these arguments before they start. For married couples, the same ground sits inside a financial settlement after divorce.
A free initial consultation is a conversation with a specialist, who gives you initial advice tailored to your circumstances. It does not include drafting or reviewing documents. Bring three things if you can: the date you moved out, a note of who has paid the mortgage since, and two or three rental figures for similar homes.
No fixed rate exists. A judge usually starts with the open market rent for the property, then looks at the share the absent owner holds. Next come the credits the occupier can raise, such as mortgage payments and other outgoings. The net figure can sit well below a full market rent, and sometimes nothing is due at all.
Claims almost always look backwards. The account normally covers the time since one owner left or lost access, up to sale or settlement. However, a judge decides what is fair for that period. If the absent owner would have been welcome back, or was led to believe no rent would be asked for, the award may be reduced or refused.
No. Each owner normally has a right to occupy the whole property, so staying is not a wrong in itself. In fact, the Court of Appeal says the starting point is that no payment is due. The other owner has to show something more, such as that the occupier shut them out or is making money from the home. Where the occupier has carried the mortgage alone, that counts on their side of the account too.
Yes, it can. When a home is shared through an estate and one of the owners lives there, the same principles apply between them. That includes the starting point that no payment is due. In fact, the Court of Appeal’s 2022 decision in Ali v Khatib concerned a family home that passed under a will, where some relatives stayed on.
Tenant occupation describes someone living in a property under a tenancy and paying rent to a landlord. A co-owner sits in a different position. They live there because they own a share, not because a landlord let them in. That difference explains why any payment between co-owners counts as compensation rather than rent. If you rent your home together instead, different rules apply, and our guide to transferring a tenancy explains that route.
Not usually as a stand-alone claim. When a marriage ends, the court deciding the finances must look at all the circumstances of the case under section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Civil partners have a matching rule in Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004. The court can weigh who lived where, and who paid the mortgage, as part of that wider picture.
Every month that passes makes the account harder to rebuild, and memories of who paid what fade fast. Book a free initial consultation, where one of our specialists gives you initial advice on occupation rent before you agree any payment or sale. You can also call 0330 094 5880, or return to our guide to TOLATA property claims.
General information about the law in England and Wales, not advice on your circumstances.
Before you argue about a monthly figure, build a simple timeline: the date one of you left, the mortgage balance that month, and who paid each instalment afterwards. Many disputes shrink once that timeline exists, because the two claims start to cancel each other out. Keep any letting adverts you find as well, since a judge prefers real local evidence to a round number.
Iblal Iqbal, Partner & Family Law Strategist
8 of 26 guides — scroll sideways for more
Short videos from the Kabir Family Law team, explaining family law in plain English.
We are a team of legally trained family law and divorce specialists with years of experience across all areas of family law. We are not part of a firm of solicitors, do not undertake legal reserved activities unless permitted and are therefore entirely independent. Please subscribe to our mailing list.
Type a topic to see the pages that cover it, or choose one below.
Or choose a topic
Or call us on 0330 094 5880
A few things we have shared lately. Plain answers, quiet updates, and the occasional reminder that you are not the first person to stand where you are standing.
Kabir Family Law, the start of the bright side of life.
View this Facebook post, opens in a new tab
When the roots are deep there is no reason to fear the wind.
View this Instagram post, opens in a new tab
Kabir Family Law brings hope to families in times of crisis.
View this X post, opens in a new tab
You are never truly alone. Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is ask…
View this Facebook post, opens in a new tab
Would you rather talk it through with someone?
Book a free consultationThe first conversation with one of our family law specialists costs nothing.
12 Cathedral Rd
Pontcanna
Cardiff
CF11 9LJ
Friars House,
Coventry
CV1 2TE
Chester House
1st and 3rd Floors
81 - 83 Fulham High Street
Fulham
London
SW63JA
16 High Holborn
Holborn
London
WC1V6BX
Clavering House
Clavering Place
Newcastle upon Tyne
Tyne and Wear
NE1 3NG
20-30a Abington Street
Northampton
NN1 2JA
2 King St
Nottingham
NG1 2AS
1 & 3 Kings Meadow
Oxford
OX2 0DP
2 Copenhagen St
Worcester
WR1 2HB
Tower Court
3 Oakdale Road
North Yorkshire
York
YO30 4XL
You do not need the right words. Tell us what is happening, or pick whatever comes closest.
What is happening?